http://www.cahsrblog.com/2013/04/chsra-selects-tutor-perini-zachry-parsons-bid-for-central-valley-section/
Price: $985 million
Price score (70 points possible): 70
Technical score (30 points possible): 20.55
Total score (100 points possible): 90.55
Dragados-Samsung-Pulice
Price: $1.085 billion
Price score: 63.55
Technical score: 26.13
Total score: 89.68
California Backbone Builders (Ferrovial and Acciona)
Price: $1.365 billion
Price score: 50.49
Technical score: 27.71
Total score: 78.20
California High Speed Rail Partners (Fluor, Skanska, PCL)
Price: $1.263 billion
Price score: 54.59
Technical score: 27.71
Total score: 78.20
California High Speed Rail Ventures (Kiewit, Granite, Comsa)
Price: $1.537 billion
Price score: 44.87
Technical score: 21.41
Total score: 66.27
初度 区間建設入札で三星が 1億ドル差で敗北. CAHSRAが低価格を非常に重視して技術的な高評価でも乗り越えることができなかった.
反対に言えば列車と管制システム部分 入札も低価格を 非常に重要視するから韓国に非常に有利な状況.
Price: $985 million
Price score (70 points possible): 70
Technical score (30 points possible): 20.55
Total score (100 points possible): 90.55
Dragados-Samsung-Pulice
Price: $1.085 billion
Price score: 63.55
Technical score: 26.13
Total score: 89.68
California Backbone Builders (Ferrovial and Acciona)
Price: $1.365 billion
Price score: 50.49
Technical score: 27.71
Total score: 78.20
California High Speed Rail Partners (Fluor, Skanska, PCL)
Price: $1.263 billion
Price score: 54.59
Technical score: 27.71
Total score: 78.20
California High Speed Rail Ventures (Kiewit, Granite, Comsa)
Price: $1.537 billion
Price score: 44.87
Technical score: 21.41
Total score: 66.27
초도 구간 건설입찰에서 삼성이 1억 달러 차이로 패배. CAHSRA가 저가격을 매우 중시해서 기술적인 고평가로도 극복할 수가 없었다.
반대로 말하면 열차와 관제시스템 부분 입찰 역시 저가격을 매우 중요시 하기 때문에 한국에 매우 유리한 상황.